These are the writings of all known early Christian fathers who contributed to Christian literature from the time following Paul until CE, the date of the 1st General Council of Nicea. They are indispensible for understanding the growth and beliefs of early Christians. I can't imagine being without them. The set I possess is a reprint of the American Edition of , produced by Hendrickson Publishers in , and annotated by A. Cleveland Coxe.
There are other editions, but this one is well done with small but easy to read type, and recommended without qualification. Perhaps the sole criticism of this edition is that it reflects none of the material than has come to light since , particularly the Nag Hammadi codexes that are available from Robinson and other fragments of perhaps lesser importance. In this respect these volumes can be considered somewhat incomplete, but that hardly detracts from their usefulness. In addition, some writings contained within have been enhanced or corrected through more recent discoveries, but again these can be handled separately by the historian as his interest dictates.
This set is a basic work and the primary evidence recognized by the early Church of the Canon and credibility of the New Testament.
- Nature and Art!
- Writings of the Church Fathers?
- The Ante-Nicene Fathers (10 Volume Set).
The writings are inferior to the New Testament, but in seeking to further and explain its teaching, are a monument to the power of the Gospel. They should be the starting point for anyone interested in early Christianity. By Adam Baker on Apr 03, This is a reprint of the 19th century version. It's not typeset with modern quality, but it's far from unreadable. It's old-fashioned akin to what you might see in the popular cheap replications of the original Shakespeare folio.
- Fathers of the Post-Nicene Era!
- St. Augustine of Hippo.
- Ten Screenplays by Firestone.
- Systems and Psychoanalysis: Contemporary Integrations in Family Therapy (The Systemic Thinking and Practice Series);
- Harbour Street (Vera Stanhope Book 6).
The print is small, but the reproduction is clear, so it's not difficult to read. Courter on Apr 28, This series is incredible. They are beautiful and sturdy. There is nothing "cheap" about the quality of these books. This is only 1 "group" of the entire set. When I was first researching this set, I compared it with that other website and simply could NOT believe the price difference!
A Customer on Jan 28, I bought this some time ago and just started reading volume one cover to cover after occasionally consulting the individual writers. It nicely collects many writings of the Early Fathers, but the introductions to each piece are biased to the views of the editors and compiler. This really isn't unique, but it can affect the way a person reads and absorbs things.
You can sense Justin's debate style in the way he speaks.
The Church Fathers Preach Against the Judaizers | Reflections on Theology and Moral Philosophy
It's pretty hardcore. This is a valuable resource to those who care about history and an extra biblical witness to the way early Christians thought and believed, as well as their battles against heresy. Barnes on Aug 28, I have found these texts a wonderful addition to my library.
There is so much information here for the individual interested in Christianity, its affordability, and breadth of information all help me to rate this five stars. I recommend this collection to anyone with the slightest interest in Christianity. You can sense the growth of the early church, the expanding theology and understanding of those Christians who followed so soon after Christ's resurrection.
I find the translation easy to read and I keep at least one volume nearby so that I can read a few pages at a time daily. By Doug Erlandson on May 08, The writings of the Ante-Nicene Fathers is a must addition to the library of any serious scholar of church history in general and patristics in particular. Almost all of the important writings, including those of Clement of Alexandria, Tertullian, Origen, Irenaeus, Justin Martyr, and many others are found in these volumes.
It was during this period, of course, that the church battled Gnosticism, dynamic monarchism and modalism, and began its fight against Arianism, the heresy that was the occasion of the Council of Nicaea in A. While it is true that a few more recently discovered writings are not included these volumes having been compiled in the nineteenth century , almost everything that it necessary for a serious study of the period is in here.
Like some of the other reviewers, I would note that this is a fairly high price for this series, since the entire set of the Church Fathers, including the Nicene and post-Nicene Fathers, can be had for not much more than this. By Rcngrunt on Dec 19, Every Christian should have this set of books.
This is only the first ten volumes of a 38 volume set. This ten volume set shows contimues where the Book of Acts leaves off. A great Church Father History. By Infantry on Dec 10, Honestly, I'm just excited to have this in my book collection I can easily overlook many of the clerical errors or small type-font. By Skycop on Jul 15, Used these in seminary and glad I was finally able to afford my own copy. The eighth day is simply the prolongation of the eschatological Sabbath to which is united the memory of the resurrection.
There is no mention of gatherings on Sunday because of the resurrection in this epistle. But what does this mean, the 8 th day? As noted above the theology of the resurrection was linked to circumcision and baptism. He writes, Before the arrival of the eighth day of the Lord Jesus Christ the whole world was impure and uncircumcised.
But when the eighth day of the resurrection came, immediately we were cleansed, buried, and raised by the circumcision of Christ. Tertullian ca. In early Christianity the eighth day had nothing to do with Sunday. Christians observing the 8 th day was meant in an eschatological sense not a literal day of the week. What of Justin Martyr? Justin claimed that Sunday worship was ordained because circumcision was on the eighth day after the birth of Hebrew males in the Old Testament:.
Now, sirs," I said, "it is possible for us to show how the eighth day possessed a certain mysterious import, which the seventh day did not possess, and which was promulgated by God through these rites Jesus Christ circumcises all who will--as was declared above--with knives of stone; that they may be a righteous nation, a people keeping faith, holding to the truth, and maintaining peace Dialogue with Trypho. Chapter XXIV.
But what does Justin mean about this circumcision? This does not mean Sunday is to be celebrated on a weekly basis.
CHAP. I.—: TIME CHANGES NATIONS’ DRESSES—AND FORTUNES.
It means exactly the opposite. After the resurrection of Christ, all the days are the same. They are the spiritual and perpetual Sabbath-keeping that occurs when anyone repents or when a Christian does good works. All of the days after the resurrection, according to Justin, have been smoothed out into one great spiritual continuum. There is no day above another, neither Sabbath nor Sunday.
The important thing is that we be spiritually circumcised, which was typified in the Old Testament legislation. On the contrary, that eighth day typology symbolizes the circumcision of the heart, not any keeping of the eighth day by Christians. When one does good works or repents, one keeps the perpetual Sabbath, no matter when those events occur in the week. It was placed there later by some anonymous author who wished to enhance the acceptance of Sunday by reading it back into the time of Justin in the middle of the second century.
We do not know who did this or when it was done, but one might estimate that it occurred sometime during the third or fourth centuries A. He does not identify it as the 6th day, the preparation day, the 14th of Nisan, or the Passover.
None of these references carry with them any specific date for the resurrection. In other words, the specific chronology of the days when Jesus died and was resurrected are not of great concern to Justin.
He is far more interested in demonstrating these as historical events and drawing from them their meaning for salvation. Once he mentions that he was crucified during the reign of Tiberius Chap. These are very broad, bold chronological strokes that have nothing to do with the specific chronology of the Sunday resurrection found in Chapter It looks rather as if it has come from another hand. More proofs are given in this source that proves that this statement was a later addition and was not written by Justin Martyr.
Source can be read here. First, the reason why Christians assemble is not mentioned. Simply because there is nothing else ; because evidence for primitive Sunday keeping is so badly needed to support a practice which has no actual basis except in tradition. Therefore the proponents of Sunday catch in vain at every straw. It is pathetic. Worse, it is spiritually and theologically dangerous. This is utterly unsound historically. Such a method leaves no room for changes in customs, or for deliberate perversions in religious practice… There is only tradition to support Sunday observance.
The tradition is not apostolic, but later. This is mostly likely the meaning in these passages. Nothing about assembling on Sunday because of the resurrection is mentioned.
Online Library of Liberty
For the one has its name from Hermes, and the other from Aphrodite. He fasts in his life, in respect of covetousness and voluptuousness, from which all the vices grow.
For we have already often above shown the three varieties of fornication, according to the apostle -- love of pleasure, love of money, idolatry. He fasts, then, according to the Law, abstaining from bad deeds, and, according to the perfection of the Gospel, from evil thoughts. Temptations are applied to him, not for his purification, but, as we have said, for the good of his neighbours, if, making trial of toils and pains, he has despised and passed them by.
For it is the highest achievement for one who has had trial of it, afterwards to abstain. For what great thing is it, if a man restrains himself in what he knows not? He, in fulfilment of the precept, according to the Gospel, keeps the Lord's day , when he abandons an evil disposition , and assumes that of the Gnostic, glorifying the Lord's resurrection in himself. Further, also, when he has received the comprehension of scientific speculation, he deems that he sees the Lord, directing his eyes towards things invisible, although he seems to look on what he, does not wish to look on; chastising the faculty of vision, when he perceives himself pleasurably affected by the application of his eyes; since he wishes to see and hear that alone which concerns him.
What is he speaking of? What is the context? N Andrews emphasis his.